FUCK YOU, Deputy Chief Justice Raymond Zondo – FUCK YOU ALL, Judiciary; Legislature; Executive.

Mike Stainbank, the rightful owner of the Trademark, The Apartheid Museum® emailed his concluding letter to Justice Zondo, Chairman of the State Capture Commission on 31 May 2021.  Email Subject: “YOU KNOW, EVERY TIME I SEE YOU, I SEE MONEY,’ MANDELA SAID. ‘GIVE ME MORE MONEY, SOLLY.”

The body of his letter refers to a letter sent to the Board of the Nelson Mandela Foundation, which is already on this website: NELSON MANDELA BEQUEATHS CRIMINALITY VIOLENCE AND DESTITUTION. Stainbank then refers to a letter sent to Chief Justice Mogoeng, where the subject is: THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF JUDGES.  This letter follows immediately after Stainbank’s letter to Deputy Chief Justice Raymond Zondo.

CONCLUSION: SCC REFERENCE: 31/1/SCC/497

Mike Stainbank is active on Twitter: @DefineRacism1 and @2001_019108_08

WEBSITE: www.fraud2001-019108-08.org.za

SCC-Chairman-Raymond-Zondo-DCJ
JUDICIAL-RACISM-FOSTERS-ANARCHY
NELSON-MANDELA-FOUNDATION-Chairman-Njabulo-Ndebele

PUBLIC PROTECTOR MKHWEBANE: “A CONFOUNDING AND VIOLENT INVESTIGATION”

PUBLIC PROTECTOR MKHWEBANE: “A CONFOUNDING AND VIOLENT INVESTIGATION” draws its title from the fact that the OFFICE of the Public Protector, headed by Advocate Thuli Madonsela, first received our complaint in 2011; ten years ago. The current investigation, headed by Advocate Busisiwe Mkhwebane, filed in July 2019, is just as simple. HUMAN DIGNITY alone, a constitutionally enshrined right, can be restored to my family by just ONE finding, made public by Advocate Busisiwe Mkhwebane. Only ONE finding. We have provided over 100 incontrovertible truths. AND, we can prove that, in 20 years, “SA APARTHEID MUSEUM” (3Words) initiated by Zionist criminals, Solly and Abe Krok, has defrauded millions of domestic and international tourists worldwide, morally, and financially. It is the magnetic pulling power of my Registered Trademark: The Apartheid Museum® that is used in this unlawful act of self- enrichment. VIOLENCE is rested in the fact that we have, since July 2019, repeatedly explained the destitution, torture, loss, and trauma that my family, and The Es’kia Institute suffer. Maladministration and fraud in organs of state, for 20 years unlawfully working in collusion with private interests, is aggravated by the fact that Gold Reef City Casino operates under a PUBLIC LICENCE.

Our letter to Public Protector Mkhwebane must be read and understood in that context.

Mike Stainbank is active on Twitter: @DefineRacism1 and @2001_019108_08

WEBSITE: www.fraud2001-019108-08.org.za

A-CONFOUNDING-AND-VIOLENT-INVESTIGATION

NELSON MANDELA BEQUEATHS CRIMINALITY VIOLENCE AND DESTITUTION

The moment Head of State, President Nelson Mandela, solicited a bribe from Zionists, Solly and Abe Krok, he ripped another thread in the quilt of our collective memory. The timeline, on the version of Gold Reef City Casino, clearly shows the Zionists then moving as an emboldened force with untrammeled power through every organ of state that had a constitutional obligation to stop them; to bring an end to” the injustices of our past.” The African National Congress, led by Nelson Mandela, on our unchallenged evidence, is a depraved White idea.

Mike Stainbank. Founder: The Apartheid Museum®

Mike Stainbank is active on Twitter: @DefineRacism1 and @2001_019108_08

WEBSITE: www.fraud2001-019108-08.org.za

NELSON-MANDELA-FOUNDATION-Chairman-Njabulo-Ndebele

SA APARTHEID MUSEUM – NEDBANK TRANSNATIONAL FRAUD

BEFORE posting this public update Mike Stainbank, the rightful owner of the Registered Trademark, The Apartheid Museum® sent it to Advocate Busisiwe Mkhwebane and copied the Deputy Public Protector, Advocate Kholeka Gcaleka, Chief Operations Officer, Charles Mohalaba, and Sibusiso Nyembe, Sylvia Van Wyk, Johan Raubenheimer, Jane Diane, Ephraim Kabinda and Lethabo Mamabolo. STAINBANK WROTE: Dear Public Protector Mkhwebane. Because Gold Reef City Casino operates under a Public Licence, this attachment will be placed on our website tonight as a public service update. Kindly indicate, before 17H00 today, whether any part of our submission is factually incorrect. Sincerely. Mike Stainbank. Founder: The Apartheid Museum. NOBODY at the Office Of The Public Protector disputed the facts outlined in this submission by Stainbank.

Mike Stainbank is active on Twitter: @DefineRacism1 and @2001_019108_08

WEBSITE: www.fraud2001-019108-08.org.za

SA-APARTHEID-MUSEUM-NEDBANK-TRANSNATIONAL-FRAUD

MALEMA MADONSELA ZONDO ZUMA VS. MIKE STAINBANK

The Public Protector conveniently excludes herself. The case of The Apartheid Museum® – after two decades – has collapsed the Democratic State. ZONDO DCJ, has never denied culpability.

BlackHouse Kollective, in this ground-breaking, evidence-based analysis, draws from unchallenged allegations and facts to demonstrate that all three spheres of government, led by the African National Congress, unlawfully colluded in the case of Mike Stainbank and the Registered Trademark The Apartheid Museum®  In just five pages, developed from a meticulous timeline, a clear picture emerges to show criminality beginning with President Nelson Mandela, through to President Cyril Ramaphosa. Through the duplicity of the Honourable Julius Malema, BlackHouse Kollective exposes ALL political parties in Parliament, who endlessly pontificate about the RULE OF LAW and the statutory laws they have promulgated for non-racist governance, on behalf of all the people of South Africa.

Mike Stainbank is active on Twitter: @DefineRacism1 and @2001_019108_08

WEBSITE: www.fraud2001-019108-08.org.za

BHK-SCC-Contents-Page
BHK-Memorandum-of-Demands-Final
MALEMA-MADONSELA-ZONDO-ZUMA-MIKE-STAINBANK-AND-DEMOCRACY-30-03-21
ZONDO-SCC-CONFIRMATORY-29-03-2021
MS-D-MYENI-J-G-ZUMA-FOUNDATION
MS-D-MYENI-J-G-ZUMA-FOUNDATION-O4-MARCH-2021

 

THE PATHOLOGY OF THE NON-WHITE SLAVE IS A FRIGHTENING THING

Mike Stainbank, is the originator of the Registered Trademark: The Apartheid Museum® In this two-page letter he makes yet another appeal to be heard by the State Capture Commission.

Stainbank provides expert legal opinion on how the abuse of state power, in all three spheres of government, could give rise to a people’s revolution.

Mike Stainbank is active on Twitter: @DefineRacism1 and @2001_019108_08

WEBSITE: www.fraud2001-019108-08.org.za

Secretary-Mosala-SCC-26-February-2021

Es’kia Mphahlele Is a Scientist: A Lifetime Dedicated To Afrika

Mike Stainbank, CEO of The Es’kia Institute, pays tribute to Professor Emeritus Es’kia Mphahlele. Stainbank concludes his essay with a tragic account of collusion and fraud between the National Lotteries Commission and the owners of the Gold Reef City Casino Licence. Mike Stainbank has been in litigation with Gold Reef City Casino for the past two decades over the exclusive rights he owns in the Registered Trademark: The Apartheid Museum®

Mike Stainbank is active on Twitter@DefineRacism1 and @2001_019108_08

WEBSITEwww.fraud2001-019108-08.org.za

Eskia101Years-2020

DEAR SOUTH AFRICA . . . and the world that visited this racist edifice

Our first attachment is self-explanatory.

Our second attachment reflects Mike Stainbank R50.00 cash deposit at Nedbank Woodmead on 19 October 2020 at 12H58

The recipient is clearly shown as “THE SOUTH AFRICAN APARTHEID MUSEUM AT FREEDOM PARK” (8 Words)

Under the Financial Intelligence Centre Act, NEDBANK, would be compelled to PROVE the LEGAL existence of their client.

BUT; the House Negro, non-white slave and racist, whether in Judiciary, Parliament or Executive will NEVER bring White Criminals to account.

The South African Police/HAWKS, also know they have limitations on arresting Racist White/Jewish Criminals.

All twenty years of this Crime Against Humanity, originate at NEDBANK Edward Nathan Friedland (Pty) Ltd.

The second attachment is conclusive proof of JUDICIAL VIOLENCE FRAUD RACISM, under a purportedly constitutional democracy.

Mike Stainbank is active on Twitter@DefineRacism1 and @2001_019108_08

WEBSITEwww.fraud2001-019108-08.org.za

The-Dishonourable-Chief-Justice-Mogoeng

Walk Your Talk Chief Justice Mogoeng

I, Mike Stainbank, confirm that I asked Chief Justice Mogoeng, to acknowledge receipt of this affidavit and others that are already published on this website. I have undertaken to ensure, to the best of my ability, that all  “Officers of the Court” (judges and others) receive these affidavits. Given my allegations, they may want to bring a lawsuit against me.

Mike Stainbank is active on Twitter@DefineRacism1 and @2001_019108_08

WEBSITEwww.fraud2001-019108-08.org.za

PERSONAL-ATTENTION-Chief-Justice-Mogoeng

Werksmans Is A Criminal Firm Of Attorneys

Mike Stainbank, under the subject WERKSMANS IS A CRIMINAL FIRM OF ATTORNEYS, transmitted his first affidavit to Chairman David Hertz of Werksmans Attorneys on 16 September 2020 and followed up with an addendum on  25 September 2020.

Stainbank makes mention of his affidavit to Chief Rabbi Warren Goldstein which is also on this website.

Mike Stainbank is active on Twitter@DefineRacism1 and @2001_019108_08

WEBSITEwww.fraud2001-019108-08.org.za

Chairman-David-Hertz-Werksmans-Affidavit
ADDENDUM-Chairman-D-Hertz-Werksmans-Attorneys

ABOUT THE JEWS IN SOUTH AFRICA
The TRUE story of The Apartheid Museum

Mike Stainbank, who registered the trademark THE APARTHEID MUSEUM® in 1990, in this affidavit, exposes more on The TRUE story of The Apartheid Museum. Mainstream media, Judiciary and many others, Stainbank swears under oath, have, by way of outlandish myths, blatant lies, and fraud misled the world. Stainbank had his affidavit commissioned on Friday 21 August 2020 and personally delivered it to the Office of Chief Rabbi Warren Goldstein on the same day.

Mike Stainbank is active on Twitter: @DefineRacism1 and @2001_019108_08

WEBSITE: www.fraud2001-019108-08.org.za

Chief-Rabbi-Goldstein-ABOUT-THE-JEWS-IN-SOUTH-AFRICA
BACK-COVER-DEHUMANIZATION

First Political Prisoner Post 1994

1998 Prospectus: The Apartheid Museum

Mike Stainbank, who registered the trademark The Apartheid Museum® in 1990 and published his prospectus in 1998, believes he is the very first political prisoner in South Africa, since the African National Congress assumed political power in 1994. In this affidavit, Stainbank explains criminality beginning twenty one years ago. This criminality, he says, has brought upon his family, violence, imprisonment, isolation, loss, destitution, trauma, and unlawful dispossession of their property. All this, he explains, comes about, through the orders of all three superior courts, at the behest of a non-existent person. He seeks public input into his assertion that he is the FIRST POLITICAL PRISONER POST 1994. Anybody, on request, is welcome to a commissioned copy of Stainbank’s affidavit.

Mike Stainbank is active on Twitter: @DefineRacism1 and @2001_019108_08

WEBSITE: www.fraud2001-019108-08.org.za

Mike-Stainbank-First-Political-Prisoner-Post-1994

The Role of the University in a Constitutional Democracy

Mike Stainbank @DefineRacism1 emailed this letter to University of Cape Town Vice Chancellor, Professor Mamokgethi Phakeng. Copied in that email is the Office of The Chief Justice, President Cyril Ramaphosa and Parliament, through the Speaker of the National Assembly.

Professor Danwood Chirwa; Dean of the School of Law at UCT replied to Stainbank’s letter. His reply is included. Mike Stainbank informs us that he has yet to ascertain whether Chirwa’s response was with or without the authority of Vice Chancellor Phakeng. None of the others who were copied have responded to Stainbank’s very serious allegations.

Mike Stainbank is active on Twitter: @DefineRacism1 and @2001_019108_08

WEBSITE: www.fraud2001-019108-08.org.za

VICE-CHANCELLOR-PHAKENG-UCT
RESPONSE-PROFESSOR-DANWOOD-CHIRWA

Seventeen Violent Years Against My Family

In this short affidavit, specifically prepared for domestic and international citizens of the world, Mike Stainbank, speaks of seventeen violent years against his family

The first court hearing in the case of the Registered Trademark: The Apartheid Museum® is on FRIDAY 20 June 2003, before Justice Brian Southwood in the Pretoria Hight Court.

Mike Stainbank is active on Twitter: @DefineRacism1 and @2001_019108_08

WEBSITE: www.fraud2001-019108-08.org.za

SEVENTEEN-VIOLENT-YEARS-20-JUNE-2003-20-JUNE-2020

PARLIAMENT POLITICS PRINCIPLES AND CHRIS HANI

When the Economic Freedom Fighters, led by Commander in Chief Julius Malema, disrupted the 2020 State of the Nation Address, they inadvertently exposed deception in the narrative that legitimizes Parliament. The EFF eventually walked out after their call for the removal of White Apartheid President FW de Klerk, failed to garner support from other political parties. Nothing in the public domain, since 13 February 2020, adequately demonstrates whether the EFF were driven by politics or principle. This short essay departs from the record of SONA 2020 and journeys through questionable aspects of the official explanation about how our Constitutional Democracy comes into existence.

In considering other truths that ground the deliberations of this essay, it is important to note first, that the Speaker of the National Assembly, Ms Thandi Modise (ANC) rose to the defense of FW de Klerk. Equally important is the support she received from ANC leaders in Parliament on the day. The FW de Klerk Foundation issued a press statement reiterating de Klerk’s position within 24 hours of the State of the Nation Address.

It is only after the EFF protest stirred public memory of apartheid atrocities, that ANC leaders realised where public anger would impact most. They implored de Klerk to consider the voter fall-out they may have to face. The retraction that followed, with an apology, saw FW de Klerk finally acknowledge United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1761. The retraction statement read in part:

It includes ‘the crime of apartheid’ as a crime against humanity and defines it as “inhumane acts …committed in the context of an institutional regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime.

Considered  with  related  notes  in  the  history  of  South  Africa,  this  essay  examines Parliaments consensus against the efforts of the Economic Freedom Fighters.

UNCHALLENGED DOCUMENTED HISTORY

Honest historians reason “apartheid” within a continuum of European aggression that began with the colonisation of Afrika in the 17th Century through to Europe’s Conference that was held in Berlin in 1884. The United States joined European nations in an unholy alliance that ruptured everything Afrikans understand as humane. They resolved to thieve both the land and personality of Afrikans. For Afrika, the most barbaric crimes against humanity can be found in documented evidence against the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, France, Italy, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom. The lineage of FW de Klerk, like Hendrik Verwoerd, can be traced back to Jan van Riebeeck who headed the first three conquering ships, Dromedaris, Rejiger and De Goede Hoop. They landed at the Cape from the Netherlands on 06 April 1652.

When the history of European cruelty is assessed by Afrikans, it becomes easy to understand why FW de Klerk, and his broader Dutch Settler Community, take exception to the UN resolution against apartheid. Understandably, they cannot comprehend why they were singled out. Afrika’s archive is replete with evidence of unspeakable, inhumane atrocities, throughout the continent. APARTHEID, in implementation, was precisely the resolution of the Berlin Conference of 1884. The United Nations, had it chosen honesty, ought to have resolved that “COLONISATION was a crime against humanity.”

PRISONER NELSON MANDELA and PRESIDENT FW de KLERK

FW de Klerk sat unmoved at SONA 2020 as truths about the violent White racist community were televised to the world. It never occurred to de Klerk, that, leaving of his own volition, may have salvaged what remnant of humanity he had left to justify his presence in Parliament. FW de Klerk and the ANC were aware of EFF plans before SONA. It is precisely this accord between the two, traced back to its origins, that exposes the fault lines in a Parliament that is explained as a legitimate progression of a negotiated settlement.

This essay draws from the fact that most historians set the date of the development of an accord between political prisoner Nelson Mandela and the apartheid regime, at or about 1985. Mandela and de Klerk though jointly awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, on both their versions, cannot lay claim to have acted honestly nor magnanimously On both versions, their accord originates in secret discussions which, initiated by the apartheid regime, immediately casts a dark shadow of exclusion, that, with the passing of time and exposés reveals decades of fraudulent misrepresentation. Typically, less than a month before SONA 2020, Ms Barbara Hogan, a Senior White ANC Operative, added more to reveal the extent to which the ANC was infiltrated by the apartheid regime. Hogan was testifying at the inquiry into the 1982 death in detention of Neil Aggett. It is Hogan’s second admission, examined with Roelf Meyer’s earlier statement, that helps us understand the questionable relationship between the ANC and the apartheid regime. Hogan explained that, in 1977, the Black Consciousness Movement and its leaders such as Steve Biko were “the most visible and active opposition to the apartheid government.” It was Hogan who described the BCM as “the pre-eminent Black political movement of that era”.

The build-up to the first “democratic” election began in 1990 when print, radio and television, was fully controlled by White media owners and the apartheid regime. The deification of Nelson Mandela and promotion of the ANC as the foremost Black liberation movement was their agenda. Roelf Meyer, chief negotiator on behalf of the regime, is a liar who needs to legitimize the process that bought about our “constitutional democracy”

“Every level-headed South African knew that essentially the settlement will come from the government and the ANC. The one had the power and the other one had the majority support. We maintained a very close link with our principles. I reported to FW de Klerk and Cyril Ramaphosa reported to Mandela, but very much on the same basis, very close line, very hands on.”

Considered against Meyer’s dishonesty, that proposition, presented to Mandela alone, to this day marketed as a magnanimous political gesture, simply does not wash. Nothing explains why the apartheid regime could not have put that self-same proposal to all political prisoners in one sitting. Every political prisoner was incarcerated on Robben Island, because of one common revolutionary objective: ‘to bring an end to apartheid’. Nobody understood that better than Mandela. The regime, on their own version, approached prisoner Mandela, with a view to ‘bringing an end to apartheid’. Mandela was aware of all manner of divide and rule apartheid schemes. Nothing explains why prisoner Mandela did not immediately reject as inappropriate, an exclusionist approach that came from the regime. FW de Klerk sat unmoved in his seat and the ANC did not support the EFF because of an accord that originates in clandestine meetings, dating back thirty-five years.

CHRIS HANI: THE POINT OF NO RETURN

Janusz Walus and Clive Derby-Lewis admitted to conspiracy that led to the assassination of Chris Hani on 10th April 1993. At the time of his assassination Hani was the revered General Secretary of the South African Communist Party and his respected legacy as Chief of Staff for Umkhonto we Sizwe, though neglected since his assassination, is nevertheless adequately documented. By most credible accounts, Chris Hani was the natural successor to Nelson Mandela, within the arrangement that is marketed as a “negotiated settlement”.

Clive Derby-Lewis, an archetypical descendant of the collective European mind that gathered at the Berlin Conference, remained firm in his beliefs until the day he died. Within the matrix of depravity and half-truths he brings to his last recorded interview, there is one aspect of his version that is proven by events over the past twenty six years, and especially, by the spectacle that played out at the State of the Nation Address. His contention that de Klerk’s National Party, surreptitiously engineered a power sharing deal with the African National Congress, cannot be faulted.

The apartheid regime freed prisoner Mandela on 07 December 1988. Charged with the responsibility to bring other ANC leaders on board, he was provided a comfortable home on the grounds of Victor Verster Prison, to receive and consult with whomsoever he pleased. Unless and until we interpret these shady events for what they really were, we will remain diverted by Janusz Walus and Clive Derby-Lewis. We will never see, as clearly as Chris Hani did, that, those clandestine meetings had brought us to the point of no return.

WHAT KILLED CHRIS HANI?

At the time Chris Hani demanded that FW de Klerk be held accountable, he was head of the SACP and MK Chief of Staff. It is in this context that the ANC position at SONA 2020, raises suspicions. In proper construction, Chris Hani preceded the EFF, ANC and every other political party represented in Parliament since 27 April 1994. The decision to continue “negotiations” with the apartheid regime, after Hani’s assassination, cannot be rationalized on the grounds we heard at his funeral and certainly not on revolutionary principles. This purportedly Democratic State does not come into being because of the revolutionary contribution of Chris Hani. It owes its existence to evidence of the machinations that Chris Hani had warned us about. A Parliament that speaks after the voice of Chris Hani has so been silenced, may one day have to account for crimes against humanity.

There exists amongst human beings, because they are human, a solidarity through which each shares responsibility for every injustice and every wrong committed in the world and especially for crimes that are committed in his presence or of which he cannot be ignorant. If I do not do whatever I can to prevent them, I am an accomplice in them. If I have not risked my life in order to prevent the murder of other men, if I have stood silent, I feel guilty in a sense that cannot in any adequate fashion be understood juridically or politically or morally. That I am still alive after such things have been done weighs on me as a guilt that cannot be expiated. Somewhere in the heart of human relations, an absolute command imposes itself: in case of criminal attack or of living conditions that threaten physical being, accept life for all together or not at all. Karl Theodore Jaspers (1883 – 1969)

Mike Stainbank. Founder: The Apartheid Museum

Criminals adorned in judicial robes – Mike Stainbank

THE INESCAPABLE CONCLUSION: These minutes form part of our JSC Complaint 489/2016, which refers to Advocate George Bizos, as the linchpin in the fraud of the owners of the Gold Reef City Casino License.

Especially because Gold Reef City Casino operates under a PUBLIC LICENCE; Mike Stainbank confirms that the content of this article can be made available to those who would prefer to have it placed under oath.

For further clarification and questions on these documents, the public is invited to engage us on Twitter @DefineRacism1 and @2001_019108_08

CRIMIINALS-ADORNED-IN-JUDICIAL-ROBES-1
GOLD-REEF-CITY-CASINO-11-SEPTEMBER-2003
Lesego-wa-Lesego-Affidavit

Mike Stainbank submissions to The South African Human Rights Commission

On 22 January 2020, Mike Stainbank, the owner of the registered trademark The Apartheid Museum® met with The South African Human Rights Commission. The Commission indicated that they are considering a review of the case of racism that Stainbank had brought to them on three occasions since the year 2003. The three submissions following the meeting of January 2020, relate to what Stainbank alleges are violent and gross human rights abuses, manifest in loss of dignity, physical and mental torture, destitution, loss of income, loss of property, dating back to the year 2000. At the heart of the matter are two White males, Solly and Abe Krok, who, with Gold Reef City Casino, claimed to have originated the three words: The Apartheid Museum. The evidence, according to Stainbank, conclusively shows that they made these dishonest claims while in possession of his 48- page full-colour prospectus under the registered trademark: The Apartheid Museum®.

SAHRC-GROSS-HUMAN-RIGHTS-VIOLATIONS-06-FEBRUARY-2020
SAHRC-RECORD-07-FEBRUARY-2020
SAHRC-RECORD-07-FEBRUARY-2020
Ltr-to-AM-Stainbank_21Jun19